From: Christoph Z. <ci...@on...> - 2011-07-07 10:05:26
|
Am 07.07.2011 00:04 schrieb Ian Bicking: > I ended up reverting that change because it also broke tests, and once I > looked at it I didn't understand the purpose anyway. Not that I mind > dropping 2.3 support ;) Since the 2to3 patch by Graham Higgins also requires Py 2.4, dropping 2.3 support would be a step forward I think. If we drop it, I am willing to go through the code and simplify it based on Py 2.4 (use decorators etc.) But I suggest creating a final 1.2.5 release with Py 2.3 support before doing this and then having a 1.3 which requires Py 2.4 after the overhaul, maybe already with Graham's patch. -- Christoph |