From: Milan B. <mil...@gm...> - 2007-10-31 18:47:02
|
On 10/31/07, Michael Hieke <mg...@gm...> wrote: > > Ah, I understand, but surely this isn't a deal breaker for us, is it? > > After all the modern systems are capable of showing those glyphs using > > full alpha channel information, and on all the other systems the user > > gets a more fuzzy, jagged-edged glyph with the correct background > > colour. Looks like a workable compromise to me... > > That wasn't very clear. Let's just agree on a parameter value that has > a good chance of producing recognisable glyphs I don't think there is any that would be applicable to *all* glyphs. > I set it to 16 for the > test version, and the key doesn't look too good, but it's not bad either. IMO, 16 is "as good as it gets" for the key (I tried both higher and lower values) But, it might be totally inappropriate for some other icon. I'll create a new poll on the website, so we can get some insight about usage of old systems. Perhaps it is insignificant. -- Milan Babuskov http://www.flamerobin.org |