From: Leyne, S. <sl...@at...> - 2001-06-08 17:52:25
|
All, In reading Jim's last message, a couple of things hit me and it has prompted me to question the whole alias problem and has prompted some questions. First, it struck me: We have been talking/I have been thinking about aliases only in the context of applications connecting to the database (which is the most common need), but what about alias support for other utilities/functions like GBAK, GFIX, etc??? So my question, do we *need* to support aliases in the utilities? Also, with respect to the suggestion which Ann made (quoted in Jim's posting) that a new option be added to the IBConfig file (AliasOnly = 1) to determine whether only aliases connections are allowed (with the expection of user = SYSDBA who should always be able to connect). Can anybody come up with a case for only requiring aliases "sometimes"? Jim and John Bellardo both mentioned user and system alias tables. Can somebody put forward a case for supporting user alias table? Finally, I'm curious -- Does anyone think that they would actual *use* client side aliases? Now some technical questions: Does the Y-Valve running on a server, know that it is running on the server? Also, if I specify a connection string of "Server:Drive:\Path\database.gdb", by the time is reaches the remote Y-Valve is it still "Server:Drive:\Path\database.gdb" or just "Drive:\Path\database.gdb"? Sean |