From: Jack H. <how...@gm...> - 2015-03-18 22:02:50
|
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Max Horn <ma...@qu...> wrote: > > On 18.03.2015, at 21:18, Jack Howarth <how...@gm...> wrote: > >> Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or >> BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that >> test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a successful 'fink >> -m' was done on an automake### package? > > Well, I can't say for sure when the last time was this happened, but I can definitely say that the full test suited, including fort4.sh, passed on my system two days ago. I.e. just before I committed automake1.15 to CVS (with Chris' permission). That was On Mac OS X 10.8.5. > >> I tried removing fink gawk, >> make and bash. None of those had any impact on the failure. > > All of those are installed on my system. Any particular reason why you picked those packages specifically? Simply as a hail-mary since they were tested for in the configure output and could be removed. > > In > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2015-02/msg00000.html > > you mention this error: > > ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean: > ./goodbye.dSYM/Contents/Info.plist > > > Which makes me wonder: Did you have the Fink libtool2 package installed when building automake 1.15? The current build demands libtool2 to be installed... The following package will be rebuilt: automake1.15 The following 2 additional packages will be installed: libtool2 libtool2-shlibs > > Anyway, I'll try to investigate some more. But not being able to reproduce this myself naturally makes it a tad harder to do so. > > > Cheers, > Max > > > >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Daniel Macks <dm...@ne...> wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:44:08 -0700, Alexander Hansen >>> <ale...@gm...> wrote: >>>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth <how...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be >>>>> to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure >>>>> isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 release. >>>>> For _test_ purposes, one could also grab the prior dejagnu.info >>>> version out of the cvs history, stash it in a local tree, then use >>>> “fink install dejagnu-1.5.1”, too. There’s no real need to use >>>> an Epoch yet, since this is just a test being done on a local machine >>>> and a manual downgrade suffices. >>> >>> Rolling back my 10.7 machine to dejagnu-1.5.1-2 does not alter the >>> fort4 test-fail on automake1.14. >>> >>> dan >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Macks >>> dm...@ne... >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored >>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all >>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to >>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the >>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fink-devel mailing list >>> Fin...@li... >>> List archive: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >>> Subscription management: >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored >> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all >> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to >> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the >> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Fink-devel mailing list >> Fin...@li... >> List archive: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > |