From: <mic...@ea...> - 2004-07-29 20:40:00
|
Le 29 juil. 2004, =E0 21:51, BABA Yoshihiko a =E9crit : > Hi, > > On 2004/07/29, at 17:18, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: > >> Could this be added to packaging for the definition of %p: >> >> You must not use /sw directly, as the user may have changed the=20 >> location of Fink's installation. Use %p instead. > > This statement seems confusing because it doesn't state where you must=20= > not use /sw. Actually nowhere, it is part of the package validation, but=20 unfortunately it is stated nowhere in the Packaging Manual, that's why=20= I suggest this addition. So it can be stated: You must not use /sw, as the user may have changed the location of=20 Fink's installation. Use %p instead. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |