From: David R. M. <dr...@fi...> - 2012-03-28 15:19:14
|
Sounds like a good idea to me! -- Dave On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to suggest to all package authors using > Depends: fink-obsolete-packages > in an obsolete splitoff, that they switch to > Depends: fink (>= 0.32) > RuntimeDepends: fink-obsolete-packages > instead. This way, building the non-obsolete package does not cause fink-obsolete-packages to be installed even though you don't use any obsolete splitoffs. > > Example: My package "wireshark" has an obsolete splitoff "wireshark-ssl". In previous versions, whenever you updated wireshark, it would also install fink-obsolete-packages, even though wireshark itself is not obsolete. > > In the new 1.6.6-1 release, I performed the change described above. Now, updating wireshark does not cause fink-obsolete-packages to be installed. Only trying to install or update the obsolete wireshark-ssl splitoff will do that. > > > Any objections to me proposing that to a wider audience on fink-devel? > > > Cheers, > Max > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > fink-core mailing list > fin...@li... > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core |