From: Alexander H. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-09-27 13:07:13
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/27/11 8:10 AM, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 27.09.2011 um 13:41 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > > [...] > >> >> My thought here is that it looks like we'd have to do >> significant extra coding to do explicit mirror selection from >> sourceforge now, so instead we might want to start having >> packages use >> >> Source: >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/<path/to/tarball/> >> >> rather than >> >> Source: mirror:sourceforge:<path/to/tarball> > > I agree with the idea that we should not try to fight SF.net's > system of automatically choosing a "good" mirror. But do we really > need to change packages for this? Can't we just change the > definition of the sourceforge mirror to only contain > http://downloads.sourceforge.net? > > Cheers, Max Sounds good to me. I've verified that http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ works as a mirror:sourceforge entry. If nobody has objections, I can set this up in HEAD. One thing I've noted is that sourceforge's automatic mirror chooser sometimes will pick a mirror that doesn't work, so users would need to retry the "same" URL--which should get kicked over to a new mirror. - -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6BynYACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+aywCfefmA8bM0IL4gHHQCHIzD/9+j /AkAnAoMdiifjwQhk9nL2YBBLo7SHxUP =cYTf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |