From: Martin C. <cos...@wa...> - 2011-04-14 12:33:37
|
Max Horn wrote: [] > Though I still agree that sometimes it's a bit tough to avoid the > package name... OK, I can't think of a concrete example right now, but > imagine you had a tool called "image" for "image processing"... using > the description "process" alone seems a bit too minimalistic. So in the > past I tried to come up with synonyms ("picture processing" maybe?) but > this can be a bit artificial at times. I have an example: The package "lie" has as its description on its web page "Computer algebra package for Lie group computations", which is both too long and contains %n. I am all in favor of removing that rule from the validator. -- Martin |