From: David H. <dm...@gm...> - 2010-05-18 13:38:11
|
On 18 May 2010 09:33, Max Horn <ma...@qu...> wrote: > > Am 18.05.2010 um 15:28 schrieb David H.: > >> I know what git is :) I am not advocating to keep CVS. I am not that >> masochistic. All I am saying is that the real benefit of git can only >> be seen when you are running it on a linux machine,see >> content-addressable filesystem layer and so on. > > And what I am saying is that this statement makes no sense whatsoever, i.e, is not even wrong. Git (and mercurial, bazaar, SVN) have *many* benefits compared to git; and none of them is related to a "content-addressable filesystem layer". > I think we are just talking about semantics here. My apologies, -d |