From: Chris D. <ch...@ch...> - 2006-03-20 02:02:23
|
On Mar 19, 2006, at 4:24 PM, David H. wrote: > The things you mention are one area where I would agree with you. > However, > there are other things tied into this, which are far better handled > by a > cooperation. For example the Fink Logo has to be owned by > "someone". The > individual ideas and ideas that are in the Fink package manager > might be > something we wish to protect in the future. The name "Fink" might > be protected > in the future and other things that are simply better handled by a > body that > does not belong to a single individual. As we believe that Fink > belongs to the > community we would like the things that "belong to Fink" also > belong to a > "legal" community. The Board of directors is such a community in my > humble > opinion. Another good example would be finkmirrors.net. I think all would agree that we'd be better off if an organization owned and managed that domain rather than burdening an individual with that responsibility. Chris |