From: <rgr...@co...> - 2004-01-31 23:23:38
|
My /sw is a symbolic link from my internal boot volume (6 GB) to an external disk (60 GB). richard$ ls -ld /sw lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 15 27 Dec 14:24 /sw -> /Volumes/IBM/sw richard$ ls -ld /Volumes/IBM/sw drwxr-xr-x 12 richard unknown 408 10 Jan 20:32 /Volumes/IBM/sw Do these look OK? The group "unknown" looks strange. I don't ever remember changing them. Are these the permissions referred to in the archived message? But I used to mount my external drive via a firewire card. But it was not reliable and I recently moved to disk to USB > > From: Alexander Hansen <ha...@ld...> > Date: 2004/01/31 Sat PM 05:56:29 EST > To: <rgr...@co...> > CC: fin...@li... > Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] Selfupdate to 0.18.0 fails chowname and failure tests > > Here's a link to a thread that sounds similar: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/fin...@li.../ > msg07807.html > > The problem was apparently with the permissions. > -- > Alexander K. Hansen > Levitated Dipole Experiment > http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX > > On Jan 31, 2004, at 4:12 PM, <rgr...@co...> wrote: > > > I have OS X 10,3.2 on an old Powerbook G3 Series. > > > > My current "fink --version" output is: > > > > Package manager version: 0.17.3 > > Distribution version: 0.6.2.cvs > > > > I ran "sudo fink selfupdate" this morning. After all the package > > descriptions were updated, it tried to update fink to 0.18.0 > > > > The following tests failed: > > > > ./Command/chowname...........NOK 2# Failed test (./Command/ > > chowname.t at line 27) > > # got: 'root' > > # expected: 'nobody' > > ./Command/chowname...........NOK 5# Failed test (./Command/ > > chowname.t at line 34) > > # got: 'unknown' > > # expected: 'nobody' > > ./Command/chowname...........NOK 8# Failed test (./Command/ > > chowname.t at line 43) > > # got: 'root' > > # expected: 'nobody' > > ./Command/chowname...........NOK 9# Failed test (./Command/ > > chowname.t at line 44) > > # got: 'unknown' > > # expected: 'nobody' > > # Looks like you failed 4 tests of 9. > > ./Command/chowname...........dubious > > Test returned status 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400) > > DIED. FAILED tests 2, 5, 8-9 > > Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay > > > > ... > > > > ./Command/failure............NOK 27# Failed test > > (./Command/failure.t > > at line 113) > > ./Command/failure............NOK 28# Failed test > > (./Command/failure.t > > at line 114) > > ./Command/failure............NOK 30# Failed test > > (./Command/failure.t > > at line 118) > > ./Command/failure............NOK 32# Failed test > > (./Command/failure.t > > at line 120) > > ./Command/failure............ok 40/0# Failed test > > (./Command/failure.t > > at line 170) > > # got: '1075577231' > > # expected: '1075577230' > > ./Command/failure............ok 49/0# Looks like you failed 5 tests of > > 49. > > ./Command/failure............dubious > > Test returned status 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500) > > DIED. FAILED tests 27-28, 30, 32, 42 > > Failed 5/49 tests, 89.80% okay > > > > ... > > > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------ > > ./Command/chowname.t 4 1024 9 4 44.44% 2 5 8-9 > > ./Command/failure.t 5 1280 49 5 10.20% 27-28 30 32 42 > > Failed 2/21 test scripts, 90.48% okay. 9/493 subtests failed, 98.17% > > okay. > > make: *** [test] Error 1 > > ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 > > Failed: compiling fink-0.18.0-1 failed > > > > I tried looking at the test scripts, but haven't been able to trace > > back > > beyond the lines referenced above. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Fink-beginners mailing list > Fin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners > |