From: <mic...@ea...> - 2004-06-18 15:07:57
|
Le 18 juin 2004, =E0 16:20, Benjamin Reed a =E9crit : > Well, it implies that they're reachable by other packages trying to > build things from source; I would say that as long as they're in a > "public" place that other packages can end up linking against, they > should be BuildDependsOnly. If you *also* need them as some kind of > runtime reference, then make a copy to treat as data files, that can = be > supplied with the runtime portion of the package. Does it imply indirectly too that there is a shared library portion of=20= the package, or can I have only header in a part (made=20 BuildDependsOnly), the reminder in other one (with the copy you=20 mentioned if needed) and no shared libraries at all? i.e: foo (the runtime package) foo-dev (with headers only) or should I have: foo foo-shlibs foo-dev To fix the idea (as cssed new version is not in Fink at the moment), is=20= scribus OK with this policy at the time being (Martin are you=20 listening?). Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |