From: Christian S. <sch...@ar...> - 2002-10-23 13:56:51
|
On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 10:58 Uhr, Max Horn wrote: > At 18:44 Uhr +0200 22.10.2002, Christian Schaffner wrote: >> Hi Jean-Francois >> >> On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 05:51 Uhr, jfm wrote: >>> Good to see it appearing in 10.2 ! >> >> It's a first start, and will get better... (E.g. svn-server etc.) >> >>> But please, give an alternative neon23 | neon23-ssl in the Depends >>> and the BuildDepends... >> >> Mhmmm... I am not sure about that. I was thinking of doing a >> svn-client-ssl variant. Do you think that is not needed? I was >> thinking that something which depends on a package in crypto needs to >> be in crypto to. But I might be wrong here. What do you think? Anyone >> else? > > Since it is an alternative depends, I think it's OK to put this in the > "normal" svn-client. Ok, I will then include the alternative in svn-client. (Do I need to up the revision for that?) >>> And is an "=" for the version really required _ wouldn't ">=" be >>> good enough ? >> >> Unfortunately 'neon23 (= 0.23.4-10)' is needed right now, since >> subversion depends on a specific version of neon. It will complain >> otherwise and not build. This should be fixed for a future version of >> svn. > > So, you mean, 0.23.5 will not work once it is released? It should, as > it has the same API - if the API changes, they will go to 0.24.x, and > you make neon24. So I don't see the problem here.. Well, I checked it again: It was like this (unfortunately) with subversion 0.14.2 and below. But 0.14.3 seems to work fine with 0.23.5 (which will be in the cvs unstable tree soon). So I will change the "=" to ">=". Thanks for your help, chris. |