From: Arnold K. <ar...@ar...> - 2012-03-27 20:22:00
|
Hi all, On 27.03.2012 16:44, Adrian Knoth wrote: > On 03/27/2012 11:12 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> Anyway, it's a good signal to everybody to upgrade, so +1 from me. > Idea: Given the current manpower, it's very unlikely that we will > maintain more than trunk. The 2.0-branch never took off, and everybody > was on svn trunk effectively. Maybe drop the branches in the future and just use tags to promote certain (stable) snapshots? > That said, I suggest we don't branch but encode the svn trunk revision > in the release. So instead of making a 2.1.0, we call it 2.Y.X, where X > is the svn revision and Y is incremented by us. Y could be the api-version as that is already something jackd and possible other clients depend on. That would also give us a big version-jump :-) Have fun, Arnold -- Dieses Email wurde elektronisch erstellt und ist ohne handschriftliche Unterschrift gültig. |