Re: [Factor-talk] Regarding the stack effects of the quotations used by the produce word

[Emeka <eme...@gm...>]

Try this
(scratchpad) 9 0 > .

You will get t (true).

Emeka

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Emeka <eme...@gm...> wrote:

> Thanks so much for raising this issue because I am studying the same page.
>
> USING: kernel math prettyprint sequences ; 1337 [ dup 0 > ] [ 2/ dup ]
> produce nip .
> { 668 334 167 83 41 20 10 5 2 1 0 }
>
> I am pretty new here and I am poorly equipped to chip in. However from Lisp
> (FP) you will have something like this ( > 9 0) and it is pretty okay. From
> the little I understood Factor is a postfix based language, so in Lisp it
> would look like this ( 9 0 >).
>
> I invite comments.
>
> Regards,
> Emeka
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Harold Hausman <hha...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Regarding this produce word:
>> http://docs.factorcode.org/content/word-produce,sequences.html
>>
>> I'm confused that the two quotations it uses have stack effects with
>> nothing on the left side of the --.
>>
>> Certainly at least the predicate needs some parameters?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any insight,
>> -Harold
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Factor-talk mailing list
>> Fac...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>>
>
>