Re: [Exult-general] Deletion of objects, serialization/saving of objects

[Willem J. P. <wpa...@ma...>]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:58:47PM -0700, Marzo Junior wrote:
>     You can have a static usecode variable pointing to an object which
>     is cached out; the ID would then be invalidated, but the variable
>     would still refer to it.

Could you explain the exact requirements of the static usecode
variables? I'm afraid I have forgotten the specifics.

Specifically: Should the object still be accessible when it is cached out?
If no, should it become accessible again if it is later re-cached in?

-Willem Jan