Re: [Exist-open] Unexpected mediocre performance with large sets of tags which are used more than once per query

[Wolfgang M. <wol...@ex...>]

> Oh that'a good question! May I add another? I didn't read the 
> distinct-values() part of the code yet because the performance of 
> count() seemed so unreasonably low to me, but isn't the 
> distinct-values(//w) in my example where //w has an old fashoined 
> (non-lucene) string index just the keys of this index? If so 
> distinct-values() should be very fast.

You can access the index keys for both, lucene and non-lucene indexes. I'll provide an example once my currently messed up build is working again ;-)

Wolfgang