From: Patrick B. <pat...@jo...> - 2011-03-09 16:20:56
|
On this topic. Do we have an effective way of organizing and documenting these tests? I could see setting up a little content management application that held the tests and produced documentation on them (based on a javadocs style commenting system) as being very helpful. Also, having some best practices / standardizations around how to write XQuery tests so they can be easily reused and shared by other developers would be hugely helpful. I think if we were able to reduce the overall complication of creating and collaborating on XQuery tests it could be a huge win for the project. Especially since JUnit tests are out of reach of the majority of developers, but following a simple tutorial and uploading some XQueries to a server definitely isn't. Thoughts? Cheers, Patrick On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Ron Van den Branden < ron...@ka...> wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On 8/03/2011 22:42, exi...@li... wrote: > > I would definitely welcome more tests on the existing function > > libraries (some of them do not even have a single test) as well as > > general XQuery features (the official W3C test suite covers a lot, but > > not all). If you write tests, please do not hesitate to post them here > > and we'll add them to the suite. > > This makes me wonder what is the best place for XQuery Unit tests? Do > you prefer to have them posted on exist-open, or attached to bug reports? > > Kind regards, > > Ron > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Exist-open mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open > -- Patrick Bosek Jorsek Software Cell (585) 820 9634 Office (585) 239 6060 Jorsek.com |