From: Andrew T. <at...@gm...> - 2010-01-12 17:40:38
|
Team, I have seen previous discussion on the mailing list about the number of resources in a collection, and the optimal number being around 2,000. The discussions often state that going above 2,000 may improve query time, but will reduce update speed. Is there a similar limit for collections? Is there a tipping point in the number of collections you can have inside a collection? Does it matter if I have 10 or 10,000 collections in a single collection? One of the side effects of wanting to break resources up into 2,000 size buckets is a proliferation of collections, and there could be a lot of them. Does anyone have any experience to say that there is a "tipping point" in this regard? Thanks, Andrew |