Re: [Exist-open] Toward a friendlier eXist startup routine

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

+1 to all of Joes suggestions

2009/7/25 Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...>:
>>> hmmm, well actually what we do report here is that Jetty ->the web >server<
>>> <- is ready......... So the alternative is..."Jetty server has started"  ?
>>
>> Interesting.  Is there a point at which eXist has started, before
>> Jetty itself starts?  I guess my idea was just that eXist could use
>> the startup routine as an opportunity to announce itself, and say,
>> "eXist is starting up.... (other status messages)...  eXist is ready
>> to rock and roll!"
>
> I tend to agree with Joe. For the ordinary user, it is not relevant if
> the main process is called jetty or eXist, and technically, eXist has
> already been configured and initialized when Jetty is started.
>
> Anyway, the user installed eXist and wants to know if it has launched
> properly. So +1 for Joe's suggestion.
>
> Wolfgang
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-open mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open
>



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
ad...@ex...
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb