RE: [SPAM-MED] [Exist-open] Re: store 400 000 small docs ?

[Guillermo B. <gb...@5d...>]

I have actually encountered the same results as Rene using the same =
settings.
Maybe there is a limit on the maximum number of files that can be stored =
in a collection.
Then again, it might be the use of non-optimal settings as Michael =
described it.
Guillermo

-----Original Message-----
From: exi...@li...
[mailto:exi...@li...]On Behalf Of Rene
Noordegraaf
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:39 AM
To: exi...@li...
Subject: [SPAM-MED] [Exist-open] Re: store 400 000 small docs ?


Hi,

Welcome to the list :)

I can't give you all the answers, but some cvs versions ago I tested=20
eXist to handle up to 100.000 docs about the same size you mention (2k / =

3k)

There's a difference in performance when running eXist solo or with al=20
the 'bells' (cocoon etc) I used XMLRPC to connect to the eXist db and it =

performed very impressive on the search-part.

My advice is to keep your collections small, a maximum of 10.000 docs in =

each collection. I noticed a performance difference when the collection=20
got too big. (>>10000) So perhaps it's an idea to work with a certain=20
collection-tree to store your data.

It will take me a while before doing more extensive test, but this is=20
what I know.

Best regards,

Rene Noordegraaf


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log =
files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick
_______________________________________________
Exist-open mailing list
Exi...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open