Re: [Etherboot-users] Booting kernel+initd files bigger then 1.44mb?
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
From: Boris <bo...@mi...> - 2001-10-25 22:17:24
|
I found out my problem. I had to specify the --param="ramdisk_size=xxxx" in mkni-linux. In my kernel, the default was 4096k [and when I added the new files, the image uncompressed to over 4096k so it would complain. I added a different ramdisk_size to something bigger and it works now. :) Thanks though for helping. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald J Christensen" <dj...@ci...> To: "Boris" <bo...@mi...> Cc: <eth...@li...> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:13 PM Subject: Re: [Etherboot-users] Booting kernel+initd files bigger then 1.44mb? > > Boris wrote: > > > > I am having problems booting [kernel+disk] image greater then 1.44mb. Is this a tftp issue? If it is, What would you recommand as a good tftpd > > server[under linux] and what parameters would I need to do to make tftpd send more then just 512bytes at a time. Also what is the image size limited > > too? It works perfect for complete images under 1.44mb. Each time I create a [kernel+disk] image greater then 1.44mb, It starts up the kernel but > > then when it loads the ramdisk part, It keeps saying "dev: 01:00 blksize=1024 blocknr=5282 sector=10564 size=1024 count=1 attempt to access beyond > > end of device." > > The tftp server is not likely to be a problem. Even with a very poor > implementation, you should be able to get 16 MB. A conformant implementation > should support 32 MB. An implementation that supports the "blksize" option > can theoretically go to 4 GB. Etherboot requests 1400+ bytes per block, > which would allow something around 90MB with a server that supports the > blksize option. > > The "standard" Linux tftp server does not appear to support the blksize > option. > > -Don > > -- > Don Christensen Senior Software Development Engineer > dj...@ci... MMABU - Mid-Market Access Business Unit > Cisco Systems ComLOB - Commercial Line of Business > San Jose, CA "It was a new day yesterday, but it's an old day now." > |