From: <ca...@gm...> - 2006-11-16 00:07:22
|
On 11/15/06, Bruce Fitzsimons <br...@fi...> wrote: > Putting a proxy such as http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ in front may be what > you want. stunnel works, but requires ongoing maintenance per server. I hadn't heard of pound before, but will look into it, thanks. Looks like there's a Debian package for it too. > The other option is to put apache on the front, and proxy the dynamic > bits to yaws, which is what I (and many others) do -- there is so much > built on top of apache that it is hard to justify my effort of getting > standard php apps (for example) to work properly/quickly/reliably > against yaws -- you can, but wouldn't you rather be writing your > application in erlang? Part of my motivation is to completely get rid of Apache. It's large and bloated, and even after using it for a decade, I barely understand the complex configuration just enough to get it working. If you've been following my messages on this list as of late, you'll see that I have been trying to get standard php/cgi apps to work properly/quickly/reliably under yaws by writing appmods and the like. I've been successful at this. So far I have Wordpress (php), Mailman, and MoinMoin all working perfectly under yaws. I feel confident that more or less any app can be made to work under yaws with a bit of erlang coding. Or at least, those that I use on my sites. > but it took me a while to recognise that I didn't > want to be a trailblazer getting tested, stable, webapps (gallery for > example) to work under yaws. Haha, I guess that's exactly what I've being doing, probably to the annoyance of Klacke and others on here. :P --=20 Cheers, L=E1szl=F3 (Yaws trailblazer) |