From: Michael O. <mw...@gn...> - 2006-04-01 18:45:14
|
Should we move to savannah.gnu.org for project development, we will have a choice between using CVS or Arch for version control. If the move happens, does anyone have any serious objections to using Arch as our revision control system? Since it would be hosted by savannah, we could have a shared centralized repository. That way, people have the option of committing changes to it in much the same manner as CVS, without requiring everyone to create their own Arch repository. I'm open to other suggestions for revision control systems as well. Darcs, for example, if we have developers that are into it. =2D-=20 Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Muse, Planner, ERC, EMMS /` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net |