Re: [Re: [E-devel] Web page]

[Ben F. <be...@ka...>]

kiuma wrote:

>Christian Kreibich <kre...@in...> wrote:
>
>>Tom von Schwerdtner wrote:
>>
>>>and I liked the animation (so says he with DSL)......the pngs were a mild
>>>issue.....I was suprised to see the whole site redesigned a day or two
>>>later...
>>>
>>I didn't like the animation because imho it didn't contribute anything
>>at all. I didn't say it didn't look good :) Hey term, you wanted
>>feedback -- here's a minor issue: while the text items on the left look
>>nice, the fact that they're images makes it harder to add new ones
>>later. If they have to be images, could we have some script-fu to
>>automate their creation?
>> 
>>Regards,
>>-- Christian.
>>________________________________________________________________________
>>
>It's also possible to create a sample button saving it in a gimp layer
>enabled format and adding text with GDynText, changing text when
>necessary. If u don't need complex graphics it should be enoght,
>considering that often semplicity coincide with readability this shold be
>a valid solution. 
>
>Ciao,
>    /kiuma
>

It is also possible to do it entirely in CSS.  Please look at this demo 
page.  It looks best in Mozilla or IE, but degrades well for 
Nutscraper.  You only miss out on the rollover effect.  It is also only 
1k.With a little tweakin, it can look pretty nice.


http://www.kalifornia.com/~ben/enlightenment_demo.html


-b

-- 
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes, and lost data
Guess which has occurred.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Patched Micro$oft servers are secure today . . . but tomorrow is another story!