From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2014-04-17 22:36:59
|
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:15:57 +0200 Stefan Schmidt <st...@da...> said: > Hello. > > On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 20:52, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:24:53 -0400 Will Hopper <wjh...@gm...> said: > > > > > Thanks for the info about compatible versions. I was guessing that it was > > > because the files were called libbulletsoftbody.so.2.81 and > > > libbulletsoftbody.so.2.81 and that the hard coded version number was > > > causing problems finding it. Anyway, I first looked around for the 2.81 > > > debs online to downgrade, but couldn't find the ones for debian, only > > > ubuntu, and they also weren't in the debian-snapshot archives. But today I > > > remembered the .deb archive of installed and previously installed packages > > > that apt keeps lying around, and luckily the 2.81 debs were still there! > > > So I manually downgraded and life is good again. > > > > > > But I'm still confused about one thing - efl still depends on libbullet > > > even with --disable-physics? > > > > it shouldn't - but we don't test disabling things like that. > > Actually we do. :) The mingw build which runs for every push to the > efl repo has --disable-physics set and we have no libbullet for mingw > installed so disabling works as expecting from what I can see. well that one then gets tested. most don't though. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... |