From: Iván B. (S. <sac...@gm...> - 2011-11-11 17:54:45
|
2011/11/11 Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>: > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >>>> >>>> 2011/11/11 Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>: >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem with that is guaranteeing that the entire thing builds. >>>>> >>>>> make distcheck... >>>>> >>>> >>>> And if it doesn't build you have the script keep trying? There's the OBS >>>> for that, though I don't know if it provides the tarballs too. >>> >>> make distcheck || exit 1 >>> >>> that way, the script exits on error. So really, there is no problem at >>> all. You can also retrieve the error code, and let the script displaying >>> message, sending a mail, etc.. and exiting cleanly >> >> Let's remember that "if it build, ship it" is not a good one. Many >> things may fail even if they compile, like some incorrect string that >> was changed with a typo. > > same problem when we release, so... Release is basically : we update > version, some file, make distcheck, we copy the tarball somewhere. > Nah, you usually test releases to make sure they actually work, instead of just firing make and uploading the package if it didn't fail. > Vincent > >> I agree with Sachiel and think they want some guaranteed-to-work (at >> least on Linux) tarballs, that they can use and assume all problems >> found are OpenBSD specific and not bug on the generic parts. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > |