From: David S. <on...@gm...> - 2011-09-14 14:33:32
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:25:59 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz <mi...@ze...> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:53:11 +1000 > David Seikel <on...@gm...> wrote: > > > From my reading of the ecore fd handler code, returning > > ECORE_CALLBACK_CANCEL from the handlers callback does the same as > > ecore_main_fd_handler_del(), which is to mark the handler for > > deletion, not actually do the deletion. The deletion actually > > happens at some later point. So it seems to be safe to do both, or > > to not have to do both. > > > > If this is true, I think it's important to document this subtlety. > > Other callbacks might have the same property. > > > r63388 Cool. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. |