From: Vincent T. <vt...@un...> - 2011-04-28 20:26:05
|
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote: > Reverting is dangerous. I guess should have written the changes to the > Changelog myself. Should I write it now or would you do it for me? do it, so that you'll put exactly what you want. Vincent > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote: >>> >>>> I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the >>>> commit message is preserved. >>>> This is the third time a patch of mine is accepted without >>>> attribution, and I think it shows a lack of care for input from users. >>> >>> what I can do is added a CahngeLog entry mentioning you as the author. >>> Would it be sufficient ? >> >> or I can revert it and re-commit it with what you want >> >>> >>> Vincent >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Eduardo. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Mac OS X does not provide an implementation of clock_gettime() even >>>>>> though it's POSIX, but it does provide a fast high-resolution >>>>>> monotonic clock through mach specific APIs that are perfectly suited >>>>>> for usage in ecore_timer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Without this patch ecore_timer throws a critical warning on Mac OS X. >>>>> >>>>> in svn, thanks >>>>> >>>>> Vincent >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > |