From: Lucas De M. <luc...@pr...> - 2011-02-28 18:25:30
|
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rm...@14...> wrote: > Em 28-02-2011 18:09, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri escreveu: >> Don't get me wrong. I had to work with XML extensively in the past and >> I used libxml2 myself. It was cumbersome to use, but managed to do >> complex things like XPath to refer to nodes, all types of DOM queries, >> etc. It is useful, but not every project will use it. > > Any XML parser is a bit cumbersome, I only see any value of using eina > if it hides the cumbersomeness of XML parsers. > > However the instant you need that little extra that your parser doesn't > do, you're adding another lib. > > Real life tells me that this is a lot more common problem than not (eg, > word processor features, everybody uses a different set of 10% of them). Real life tells me that those ugly freedesktop / hal / pk / d-bus file were always like that and could be parsed by simple parsers like the one Gustavo sent. And they are not changing anytime soon. regards, Lucas De Marchi |