From: Raphael K. da C. <ku...@pr...> - 2011-01-31 19:17:30
|
David Seikel <on...@gm...> writes: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:00:21 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa > <ku...@pr...> wrote: > >> "Enlightenment SVN" <no-...@en...> writes: >> >> > Log: >> > :/ setting a const char * param to NULL ?? and after the >> > return ?? :O random spank >> > >> > Author: davemds >> > Date: 2011-01-31 10:48:50 -0800 (Mon, 31 Jan 2011) >> > New Revision: 56611 >> > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/56611 >> > >> > Modified: >> > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c >> > >> > Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c >> > =================================================================== >> > --- trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c 2011-01-31 >> > 17:29:24 UTC (rev 56610) +++ >> > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c 2011-01-31 >> > 18:48:50 UTC (rev 56611) @@ -321,7 +321,6 @@ return url_con; >> > #else >> > return NULL; >> > - url = NULL; >> > #endif >> > } >> >> If we enter the #else, we need to use the `url' parameter, otherwise >> the compiler will complain about unused parameters. > > The compiler is not bitching about unreachable code? I've never compiled this code without libcurl, so I don't know. If it does, (void)url; return NULL; might be more appropriate. -- Raphael Kubo da Costa ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi |