From: Cedric B. <ced...@fr...> - 2010-09-10 09:53:07
|
Just because I am little bit annoyed by this troll, I will answer at the top of this message. We are not considering moving to another SCM. If you want to setup a git svn on github, fine. But no need to troll in this thread, we should be speaking about commit message policy. So I hope, that the latest troll I see in that thread. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Camboulive <hug...@gm...> wrote: > Have to agree with Eduardo Felipe. > We're doing the ~exact~ same thing here at our company, having a > periodically git-svn synced repository to work on. > AND I also had the same thought about creating github repositories to > be synced regularly, it would be so much easier. > Maybe it's because it's a more natural way to work? Food for thought. > > Git allows people that do not have the rights for pushing upstream to > still work and commit their changes in their branch (NOT sending > patches on the ML, a pull request is just so much more convenient), > and they could make their branches available to ~everyone~ instead of > keeping them local like we're doing right now. It means more > transparency in who did what, and more fine grained control upstream > over what is merged, etc... > The fear of having the project lead "stolen" by someone who does not > push patches is groundless, because upstream always has much more > momentum (look at all the other big projects using git) > > Seriously, SVN is a pain, the workflow is prehistoric. A github mirror > would be a blessing. > > (And I know it's not what you wanted to talk about, really sorry about it) > > Regards > > Hugo Camboulive > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Eduardo Felipe > <edu...@gm...> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> <bar...@pr...> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte >>> <lei...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte >>>>> <lei...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> with regards to the commit message part: >>>>>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and make the server reject commits if necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira: >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >>>>>>> <bar...@pr...> wrote: >>>>>>>> 4 - The fourth annoyance is related to the previous and is could be >>>>>>>> called "commit torrent" or "ssh over svn" or "gcc over svn" and is the >>>>>>>> result of people committing every line or test they do, then >>>>>>>> committing couple of changes, then commit removing debug code, then >>>>>>>> another fix... (...) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *cough* git *cough* *cough* >>>>>> As you know, a couple of weeks ago, I had a little poll [0] around. >>>> As some already mentioned, I need to extend this poll by another one e.g. "Which VCS would you like to use with EFL?". Still the outcomes of this poll should be just seen as a hint for others who might want to give a sync of servers/services a try. >>> >>> Let's take the VCS out of this thread, as I said Raster will not move, >>> so even if we use git for one or another dev, the main tree will >>> follow as SVN... and even moving to GIT, if we keep current commit >>> quality (messages, torrents, ...) we'll have the aforementioned >>> problems. >> >> If I can have my two cents, here it is: >> >> My company uses git-svn, with a "curated" version of EFL, internally. >> We cherry-pick fixes and only get in sync with svn HEAD on >> snapshots/releases. There's been a lot of discussion internally if we >> should publish our repository on github, which I'm against as it would >> look like a "fork of EFL" or something like it. That being said, I >> honestly think that there should be a mirror of SVN on github, at >> least for EFL (eina, evas, etc), so users who already are on git can >> have a central place to do updates and create patches. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Eduardo Felipe. >> >> >>> -- >>> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >>> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems >>> -------------------------------------- >>> MSN: bar...@gm... >>> Skype: gsbarbieri >>> Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>> >>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>> _______________________________________________ >>> enlightenment-devel mailing list >>> enl...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Automate Storage Tiering Simply > Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful, > automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how > you can reduce costs and improve performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > -- Cedric BAIL |