Re: [E-devel] [RFC] Evas module move to Eina module API

[Michael J. <e-...@ka...>]

On Wednesday, 10 June 2009, at 14:06:52 (+0200),
Cedric BAIL wrote:

> > "Static linking of applications to the XYZ library does not constitute a
> > derivative work and does not require the author to provide source code
> > for the application, use the shared XYZ libraries, or link their
> > applications against a user-supplied version of library XYZ."
> 
> I would like to state that this is only relevant for system without
> dynamic linking and it make sense in my opinion. So what do people
> think of :
> 
> "Static linking of applications to eina library does not constitute a
> derivative work on system that does not provide dynamic linking and
> does not require the author to provide source code for the
> application, use the shared eina libraries or link their applications
> against a user-supplied version of library eina".

The originally-suggested text says the same thing and is grammatically
correct.  It's probably unwise to have grammatically dubious text in a
legal statement.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <me...@ka...>
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Act like you expect to get into the end zone."        -- Joe Paterno