Re: [E-devel] moving things to OLD/BROKEN

[Viktor K. <vko...@gm...>]

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:52 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Viktor Kojouharov<vko...@gm...> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:01 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I want to move the following projects to BROKEN/OLD as they're one of them:
> >>
> >>    - edje_viewer (edje_player/edje_editor work better)
> > I don't consider the  viewer to be neither broken nor old. I still use
> > it whenever I need to take a peek at edj files.
> 
> it's not broken now because I keep fixing it, but really I gave up on
> it as I'm not using it anymore. All features are present in
> edje_editor and even more is there. Also, it uses etk and no one is
> maintaining it (last patches were made by me), I plan to deprecate etk
> soon, probably after Canola and other pieces (ie: Edje_Editor) moves
> to Elementary or something else, so the less code we have depending on
> it, the better.
I'm planning on moving edje_viewer to elementary, whenever I have some
spare time to do so. And since when was our policy to deprecate stuff,
just because there is other stuff in the repository with can present
similar results?

> 
> Also, for quick edj view, did you ever consider edje_player? IMHO it's
> better to move edje_player and edje_editor from PROTO to root and move
> (NOT DELETE!) edje_viewer to OLD.
>