Re: [E-devel] edje_decc patch

[Tilman S. <ti...@co...>]

dan sinclair [2007-02-05 12:17]:
> Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> > DaveMDS [2007-02-05 05:05]:
> >> here's a patch for edje_decc that create a file called default.edc in=
=20
> >> the decompiled source dir.
> >>
> >> The file contents is only a line that include the main edc file.
> >> If the default.edc file exist none is created
> >> With this patch I can open edj file from edje_editor (engrave run=20
> >> edje_decc and always open default.edc).
> >=20
> > NAK. Breaks compatibility with redact for no good reason.
> >=20
>=20
> It used to be that edje would output the main .edc file as=20
> main_edje_source.edc (or something similar) this made life for engrave=20
> really easy as we'd just look for that file. Now, it uses whatever the=20
> coder sets as their default file.
>=20
> We have no-way to know what the main .edc file is called anymore. (Well,=
=20
> besides parsing the rebuild script I think). Having it either rename he=
=20
> main .edc file to something common, or spitting out a commonly named=20
> file means that an editor can open the .edc files decompiled from the=20
> .edj file.

The correct way would be of course to just read the EET.
But maybe you want to introduce another edje_decc switch that overrides
the name of the first SourceFile entry (=3D main file name).

edje_decc --main_file BLAH.EDC

It's a hack, but I still think that the concept of Engrave isn't quite
perfect :o

Regards,
Tilman

--=20
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?