From: James M. <mo...@br...> - 2003-03-21 18:14:18
|
This would actually reduce infrastructure, or at least I'm under the (mis)belief that it does. Imlib2 would take over the role of not only imlib1 but fnlib as well. You don't need edb or xcf loaders for e16, so you don't need to build edb itself or the extra loaders. So, unless I'm missing something, it would be a reduction. -James P.S. To whomever watches over what emails come from wrong addresses to the list, delete my previous response from mo...@ac.... Sorry, I sent from the wrong addr. Bob Arendt (rd...@ri...) wrote: > Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their > distributions? I rather like being able to build e16 without > having to build a lot of the infrastructure as well. > -Bob Arendt > > James Moss wrote: > >On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone > >has thought about moving e16 to imlib2? I know it's in the TODO for > >e16... any thoughts? I'd be interested in helping out with this. > > -James > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel |