Re: [E-devel] E17 future

[Hall S. <hal...@mi...>]

At 01:31 PM 3/17/2003 -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
>>Hall Stevenson <hal...@mi...> writes:
>> > I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to
>> > Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal with that ?? As I
>> > recall, evidence's website doesn't even mention E, or if it does,
>> > certainly not prominently.
>>
>>   You know, you're right.
>>
>>   I hacked up a token page when I put ev on SF because I routinely
>>   ignore projects that even their authors think isn't worthy of a
>>   page (or more to the point, screenshots : ), and then went back
>>   to coding.  I simply forgot to update the page when ev wasn't
>>   vapor anymore.  It is fixed now.  Thankyou.
>>
>>   evidence is e-related in the following ways:
>>
>>   - Can be linked against e17 libraries -- evas, eet, edb, ebg,
>>     almost the whole enchilada -- for enhanced eye-candy.  This
>>     is the preferred setup.
>
><snip>
>
>>     inasmuch there are optional loaders so people can reuse
>>     scrollbars and stuff made for e17 (with etcher).
>
>Well, how well does it operate with e17 ?? I'm currently trying "another" 
>WM... :) Been using E 0.16.x for what seems like a looonnnngg time and I'm 
>simply not interested in keeping up with CVS stuff (e17) anymore. I'm 
>certainly looking forward to the day it settles down and will probably 
>come back.

Doh !! That should say "how well does it operate WITHOUT e17 !! :)

Anyway, I looked at the download page and see that ebg, edb, etc are 
*required".

Hall