[Emc-developers] request testing [was: QA notices]

[EBo <eb...@us...>]

This was bothering me enough that I just went in and patched the source 
files.  It was a little more involved than I thought, but not that much.

Attached are two patches to correct the problem.  Can someone(s) else 
do some testing with them and give me feedback?

Thanks and best regards,

   EBo --

On Apr 7 2014 3:22 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 April 2014 08:23, EBo <eb...@us...> wrote:
>> I guess the question is that if we can fix it, should we?  What is 
>> the
>> prognosis of a replacement?  I know people have been talking about 
>> it
>> for a decade or more now, so if there is not one on the horizon, 
>> then
>> maybe we should look at least taking care of the low hanging 
>> fruit...
>
> I think every instance in that list was in libnml.
> It is unlikely that when writing NML anyone wrote "u_long" to mean
> anything other than "unsigned 32". And especially unlikely that they
> meant "I don't care if this is 32 bits or 64 bits"
> So, a global search and replace might be an acceptable move. But not
> one I feel like performing.
>
> --
> atp
> If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
> http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Put Bad Developers to Shame
> Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
> Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
> Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_APR
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers