From: Chris R. <ch...@ti...> - 2009-12-28 23:21:31
|
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:18:21PM -0600, Chris Radek wrote: > > With this scheme there are no modes, no new readouts, no new gcodes. > In any place where you would normally specify X and/or Y, you can > specify @R<T instead. I went ahead and incorporated this change today. I changed the @R<T specification to @R^T because we use #<...> for named parameters. Even though it worked fine, I figured if I used (unmatched) < for angles too, it would unnecessarily torture people who want to set up their editors to colorify gcode. Chris |