From: Reiner J. <r....@cr...> - 2004-02-06 13:40:52
|
I have forward the mail to milosch and Lars. They are the maintainer for the LDAP stuff. I know it was something fixed. I wait to the response from them (I sure today) but i absolutely sure it is fixed with the new ACL class. One moment, i remembet. Take a look at the primary group in the user administration. I think this was special for LDAP. Am Fr, den 06.02.2004 schrieb Patrice Lallement um 14:28: > Normally, we should not have a user with the same uidnumber than a group. > So, the question > should be : How eGroupWare works when it has to integrate an existing LDAP > database with > users and groups ? It seems that there is a conflict between the uidnumber > and > gidnumber range defined during the setup of egroupware, and the existing > ldap database. > Is there a process to avoid such problems ? > > Patrice > > anne edge-it <ani...@ed...> écrivait: > >Hello > > > >I've got a strange problem with ldap in egroupware. This morning I wanted > >to > >give some acls for agenda. I gave it for a group "sit" whose gidnumber is > >1038. > > > >When I connected to egroupware with a user whose group is "sit", I saw all > > > >users of this group and one more, whose uidnumber is 1038. > > > >What about this kind of problem ? > > > >Thanks > > > >-- > >Anne NICOLAS > >EDGE-IT (Open Source Support Provider) > >http://www.edge-it.info > >std: +33 (0)1 44827885 fax: +33 (0)1 44827889 > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > >_______________________________________________ > >eGroupWare-users mailing list > >eGr...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-users > > > -- |