Re: [eGroupWare-developers] AddressBook -- can't search on customfields?

[Reiner J. <r....@th...>]

Am Freitag, den 31.12.2004, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Esben Laursen:
> Reiner Jung wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2004, 07:37 -0600 schrieb Jason Byrns:
> >> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> >>> Operate table makes things complex, you have to deal with
> >>> permission, keeping table structure correct when upgrading, and
> >>> perhaps other reasons I do not know. Your method makes sense,
> >>> because in your way it's efficient and result fast and clear SQL
> >>> query. But I think the original author must have thought about it
> >>> as it's very easy. 
> >> 
> >> I'm sure things are more complicated than I made it sound.  My
> >> version of a simple table for custom fields would probably work
> >> great, if you weren't doing any kind of multi-user system!  ;)
> > 
> > We work on a new address book. It is nearly finished and will be
> > hopefully released January 2005
> 
> Will this include a XML-RPC interface as well as the old one?

It must include it

> 
> --
> Esben
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> eGroupWare-developers mailing list
> eGr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-developers