From: Pedro M. S. O. <pms...@gm...> - 2009-12-30 10:12:44
|
Hi I disagree on you both about the new EFW firewall interface, I see it much more complete and feature rich than the previous one. This new interface has more advanced options that you may use and it reseable best the iptables capabilities. In my opinion this is the way to go and it will be the difference between an home router and a business system. im sure that with a bit of reading about firewall and the way they work you ll get there. cheers, pedro www.linux-geex.com 2009/12/30, jonas kellens <jon...@te...>: > I share your opinion. I'm still using Endian 2.2 for this reason. > > Now I'm checking Untangle, which is quite good also. It has the "easier > configuration"-version of Endian 2.2 when it comes to firewall, port > forwarding/NAT and QoS. > > You need to adapt the interface of Untangle, but with the wiki and an > active forum/mailinglist you'll get there. > > Jonas. > > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 03:37 +0000, oneforall immortal wrote: > >> HI >> I wish there was a nice bug page for users setup. Becaus the eamil >> is so hard to use and see responses etc. >> But anyway I asked a while ago and witht his email system it so darn >> hard too find out if therer was any answers. I find and have seen >> others too having trouble getting things that used to be easier to >> setup and now are way to hard or like myself just give up trying. I >> can't figure out howto have the addresses/web pages bypass the proxy >> like it was done in 2.2 mush easier, becaude I never had to ask. Also >> on my box with apche running I used to be able to on that same box put >> in the domain anme and it worked. But now it only work using >> localhost:81/ . Thats no good for testing and frustrating also to >> figure out with out success:( >> Some new features are nice but when thing that used to work much >> easier are to hard to even figure out its diapionting :( > > > |