From: Ronciak, J. <joh...@in...> - 2006-07-27 17:38:43
|
The errors look like you are runnign half duplex on the connection. All = of those type of erros happen when the connection is on a shared LAN = segment. Is the connection configured correctly? Both sides (switch = and host port) either set to autoneg or both being forced? If forcing, = is it being set to full duplex? What does the switch report in it's = stats? Cheers, John ----------------------------------------------------------- "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little = temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.", Benjamin = Franklin 1755=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: e10...@li...=20 > [mailto:e10...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Jan-Patrick Perisse > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:04 AM > To: e10...@li... > Subject: [E1000-devel] RX lockup problem >=20 >=20 > I managed to update my RH ES 3.0 kernel to 2.6.17.6 (vanilla) kernel. > e1000 driver is now: > driver: e1000 > version: 7.0.33-k2-NAPI > firmware-version: N/A > bus-info: 0000:03:08.0 >=20 > Just to remember, I was having machine lockups when connecting: > 03:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation=20 > 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Fiber) (rev 01) > 03:08.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation=20 > 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Fiber) (rev 01) > to a CISCO CATALIST 5505 gigabit controller. >=20 > When I first recompiled the kernel, I left the=20 > dual onboard gigabit controller (also e1000)=20 > enabled. With this configuration, the machine=20 > still locked up after some minutes. > Now I disabled it and It is online for 12 hours. > I still have plenty of errors on the connection to the CISCO: > ethtool -S eth1|grep errors > rx_errors: 404434 > tx_errors: 0 > rx_length_errors: 101778 > rx_over_errors: 0 > rx_crc_errors: 276478 > rx_frame_errors: 0 > rx_missed_errors: 82 > tx_aborted_errors: 0 > tx_carrier_errors: 0 > tx_fifo_errors: 0 > tx_heartbeat_errors: 0 > tx_window_errors: 0 > rx_long_length_errors: 24 > rx_short_length_errors: 101754 > rx_align_errors: 0 > rx_csum_offload_errors: 12700 > I tried changing the supervisor on the cisco, but it didn't help. > I noticed that when testing the connection, I=20 > have no errors at all. I tried testing by pinging=20 > -f the cisco itself. No errors. When I load all=20 > the other ports of the cisco and the traffic goes=20 > up to about 5000 packets per second, I have those errors above. > Is it possible that the traffic is causing the cisco or the=20 > NIC driver to fail? >=20 > Thanks again. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Jan-Patrick P=E9riss=E9 > AEON TECHNOLOGIES > (21) 2705-3139 / 2705-3028 > http://www.aeontech.com.br >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv=EDrus e > acredita-se estar livre de perigo. >=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the=20 > chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and=20 > earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge &CID=3DDEVDEV _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E10...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel |