From: Morris, C. <ChrisM@SNELLINGCORP.COM> - 2000-10-30 13:28:12
|
> I say that DUnit should be retained for conceptual clearness. > To include "DUnit" is much better than including "TestFramework". > I would rather take the code in TestFramework and move it into > DUnit, just to keep the DUnit name as the primary unit to include. > > -Stefan Originally, there was only DUnit, then everything was moved into TestFramework (I'm not sure why -- Juanco and Jeff did that, IIRC). I'm on both sides of this one -- I think TestFramework is a better name, but if the whole schmeal is called DUnit, it seems inconsistent. I dunno. At this point, I'd rather not go back the way it was simply because that's less of a change. Chris |