From: Vandoorselaere Y. <yo...@ma...> - 2000-05-05 08:59:02
|
Josh Faust <jo...@fa...> writes: > On 4 May 2000, Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote: > > > Adam K Kirchhoff <ad...@vo...> writes: > > > > > On 4 May 2000, Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote: > > > > > > > Adam K Kirchhoff <ad...@vo...> writes: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 May 2000, Marco Ghidinelli wrote: > > > > > You'll get no arguments from me about that... Frankly, open source > > > > > drivers are preferable, but if nVidia can give me better performance with > > > > > the least headaches, I'm more than willing to use their drivers... > > > > > > > > <rant> > > > > bravo. > > > > If every people out there was acting like you, > > > > the open source world never being what is it today. > > > > </rant> > > > > > > You mean it wouldn't be full of ranting, raving lunatics? I don't use > > > Linux, or the DRI, because they're open source. I use them because they > > > serve my needs better than any other option, including, for the time > > > being, nVidia's GL drivers. > > > > agree, > > but i think that people using linux could, at least, respect it's philosophy. > > So you would prefer it if there was NO proprietary software for Linux? exactly. -- -- Yoann, http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/ It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc(). The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments. |