From: Dan N. <dbn...@gm...> - 2009-11-30 01:23:23
|
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, vehemens <veh...@ve...> wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: >> On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote: >> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: >> > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: >> > > >> > > [snip] >> > > >> > > > Your missing the point of using a development structure which >> > > > supports collobration. >> > > >> > > [snip] >> > > >> > > > The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now. >> > > >> > > [snip] >> > > >> > > > Again, your missing the point of using a development structure which >> > > > supports collobration. >> > > >> > > [snip] >> > > >> > > > It hasn't moved "... well beyond what was in drm git." If you >> > > > believe otherwise, your only fooling yourself. >> > > >> > > [snip] >> > > >> > > > See above comments. >> > > >> > > Yes, you have made it abundantly clear that you are in favor of having >> > > a centralized repository for all DRM development. The fact is, that's >> > > not happening now and is not going to happen. That used to be the >> > > case, but the linux DRM developers did not see an advantage to that for >> > > themselves, and though rnoland was unhappy with the decision (because >> > > it made his job harder), the linux DRM developers did what they felt >> > > was best. >> > >> > You assuming what what good for Linux for a developer, is also good for a >> > BSD developer. As for making rnoland's job harder, it was his choice. >> >> Nice try, but I am making no such assumptions. It was not rnoland's choice >> to stop having the linux DRM developers stop using a centralized repository >> for all DRM code. He was quite clearly opposed to it and did not consider >> it a good choice. > > You missing the point as is rnoland. Just because the linux DRM developers > stopped using a centralized repository, didn't mean FreeBSD shouldn't as the > intial integration work would be still shared reducing the burden on any one > person. The approach taken by rnoland however was to shift all the work to > himself. Sorry to stick myself into this conversation, but isn't the freebsd tree now your centralized repository? Can't you just clone that and continue as before? -- Dan |