Re: [RFC] Use kernel_map_pages() to avoid illegal page aliasing.

[Jeremy F. <je...@go...>]

Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For a long time now, the agpgart module has been creating illegal 
> mapping aliases, since the user-space mappings of the pages in the 
> gart are usually write-combined, whereas the kernel linear mapping of 
> the same pages are uc for x86, and may even be wb for some architectures.
>
> In order to fix this, and to facilitate fast insertion and removal of 
> pages into / from the gart I'd like to disable all default kernel 
> mappings for those pages, which would in effect, make them behave as 
> highmem pages from our point of view.
>
> As prevously discussed, the x86 set_memory_xxx() interface wasn't 
> suitable for this, since it handles only a single mapping, and the 
> pages may have more than one default kernel mapping.
>
> But it turns out that there is an interface that does exactly this. 
> kernel_map_pages(). But it is only available  with 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. I'd like to make that function exported by 
> default, but with some minor alterations as the original functions 
> does some debug checks as well, that aren't desirable for the purpose 
> mentioned above:
>
> As with highmem pages, if the driver sets up user-space mappings with 
> non-standard caching attributes, those mappings need to be killed at 
> suspend time, since the suspend code would otherwise create temporary 
> incompatible mappings.
>
> On x86 this all would probably work fine. Does kernel_map_pages() work 
> identically on other architectures? Specifically: Will it always work 
> with a 4K page granularity?

Well, not all architectures use 4k as their base page size, but 
kernel_map_pages should work at the smallest supported page size.

The disadvantage of this is that it will end up shattering any 
large-page mappings the kernel has.  This is pretty much unavoidable 
unless you can arrange to only allocate AGP pages in a physically 
distinct area away from other kernel allocations (a mechanism to do this 
might be generally useful, though I'm not sure what form it would take - 
another zone perhaps?).

    J