From: Roland S. <rsc...@hi...> - 2005-12-09 12:21:18
|
khaqq wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:35:37 -0500 > Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> wrote: > > >>On 12/8/05, Roland Scheidegger <rsc...@hi...> wrote: >> >>>khaqq wrote: >>> >>>>I wonder if different *video* chip revisions could be a factor. >>> >>>An interesting idea. I've never heard that there were multiple revisions >>>of these chips (which made it to retail), though it might be possible. >>>It should be printed on the gpu itself afaik, or is it possible to get >>>this information otherwise? >> >>I think you can grab it from a register. also lspci might tell you. > > > This is what I have on mine : > > RADEON 8800 > 215R7MAGA13H > G20152.1 > 0219AA > TAIWAN > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R200 QH [Radeon 8500] (rev 80) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) > Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc FireGL 8800 128Mb I'm not sure where the die revision would show up there, but in any case I didn't find indication there are other r200 chips around which have a different designation (215R7MAGA13H is I think what matters here, though 8500/9100 cards all have a r200 chip with 215R7AAGA13H instead, not sure why it would have a different name there). Roland |