From: Aapo T. <ae...@ra...> - 2005-08-25 17:30:46
|
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:19:19 +0200 Roland Scheidegger <rsc...@hi...> wrote: > Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > That check doesnt currently seem to work because some setup(at > > preinit) with color tiling enabled will get done earlier. > > > > Does this version break r200s or radeons? > From the top of my head, I think it does. For certain 16bit resolutions, > that is (as the resolution won't be a multiple of 2048 bits wide, which > is the block width of those chips for color tiling - i.e. 64 pixels for > 32bit, 128 pixels for 16bit). That said, I think the use of > info->MaxSurfaceWidth doesn't make any sense there, it is pure > coincidence that "2048" is the same (in pixels) for the max width as it > is (in bits) for the pitch increment. Isn't the block width of the r300 > based chips 2048 bits too? It seems to be. -- Aapo Tahkola |