From: Alex D. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-06-30 13:49:30
|
On 6/30/05, Keith Whitwell <ke...@tu...> wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: > > > >>Please note that I havent tested this with current xorg cvs because of = various inconveniences. > >>What about the 2560 limit? > >>I noticed that with the new RADEONDoAdjustFrame I can have 1280x1024-12= 80x1024 setup if I remove the limits. > > > > > > I assume you are talking about the limits of the surface regs. I'll > > check the databooks tonight and see if I can figure out what they > > should be. Apparently the fglrx driver allows 2560, but that would > > seem to require an extra half bit of address or something. Maybe it's > > actually 12 bits, but they limit you to 2560 for bandwidth reasons... >=20 > Or to hit a number that is significant for marketing purposes, like some > sort of XXXGA or HDTV standard resolution. >=20 true... I think some of those new widescreen monitors are 2560 pixels wide. > Keith > |